There is placement of the extract, and genre of the movie. Reference and background on the director as well as the main actor in the movie. Small but still there, reference to the historical/socio-cultural context of the piece. Included a quote or two about the movie.
Shares a theme that connects to the overall movie but doesn't specify how it helps the film as a whole. Doesn't touch much on the sound design. Not too much time spent of explaining cinematography. General usage of film language. General description and not much analysis. The time limit was not fully used. Some redundant material.
Mark: 18
oral under the spotlight: Brothers (A. Rich)
The student in question states the genre of her movie and her extract. She was able to reference most of what she was saying to her extract like the theme of experiencing post-dramatic stress. She does a lot of referencing back to the effects of post-traumatic stress. She was able to touch on actors and how they prepared. She related her oral presentation to overall war movies like The Hurt Locker; she has quotes on war films.
Spends a lot of time explaining the extract. She repeats the genre information. She had quotes that relate to the overall genre of war films but spends a lot of time talking about The Hurt Locker. There's no reference to the topic of historical/socio-cultural times. There wasn't much use of film language. No reference to the cinematography or sound design and how it enhances/effects the movie.
Mark: 12
